2006 Chevrolet HHR vs Chrysler PT Cruiser
2006 Chevrolet HHR vs Chrysler PT Cruiser
The 2006 Chevrolet HHR and Chrysler PT cruiser are great additions to compact crossover automobiles. Both cars feature a great amalgam of flexible, spacious interiors and powerful and efficient engines, providing the most sought-after features of the vehicles. But their functionality is assessed by evocative design and engineering, increasing their hype for being beyond the merely useful.
Introduction to an HRR:
Heritage High Roof (HRR) resembles the 1949’s Chevy Suburban and the SSR roadster. The 2006 Chevrolet HHR is all about great functionality despite its vintage looks. Auto experts assume it to be a response to the Chrysler PT Cruiser. However, it attempts to provide the public with a better compact crossover than the bigger rigs that consumed much oil and had poor fuel economy because of the rising fuel prices.
Introduction to Chrysler PT Cruiser:
Chrysler PT Cruiser offered people a combination of old-style vehicles with great functional convenience. The sales turnover expanded its market quickly, and soon, it was one of the best compact crossover vehicles. GM, all impressed by the functionality and design of PT Cruiser, recruited the designer who designed PT Cruiser to produce HHR for Chevrolet.
Is HHR the clone of Chrysler PT Cruiser?
Though the 2006 Chevrolet HHR and PT Cruiser have some similarities in design since both cars have the same brand behind the design, HHR is not a clone of the PT Cruiser. People called the 2006 HHR Chevy’s finest utility vehicle because of its design and functionality. Its interior offers many variabilities; the key purpose was to utilize the Delta platform’s abilities to make it drive as car-like as possible, underscoring its dynamic virtues with car-like ergonomics and comfort.
Although some models come with the quirky placement of controls, the cockpits of these cars were much quitter and well-honed.
The engineering of HHR outperforms that of PT Cruiser. PT Cruiser features the steering wheel at a wrong angle, making it feel associated with the industrial side of the track. Even the PT’s seat lacks the required support. PT’s great engine, clean-shifting manual transmission, and perfect electric steering seem cool unless you encounter a bad driving position.
The Dimensions:
One may assume that the key feature that separates HHR and PT is the driver’s better position and thus control of the car. Dimensions are not much different; besides, the HHR is a few inches long; the distance from the dashboard to the rear door is nine inches greater. Both models accommodate an eight-foot ladder with multiple seat foldings and deployments to offer different interior configurations. However, the better driving position of HHR and its configurations will make it more enjoyable to move the ladder around in Chevy’s car.
Energy and Powertrain:
HHR offers a four-speed transmission that automatically imparts crisp and smooth gear changes to make it quick on downshifts. Thus, each crank shift plays its part and makes HHR seem quicker than 172 hp. It has well-modulated brakes, and impressive steering helps the driver keep it poised while traveling on busy roads. Here is a self-descriptive HHR parts diagram for its engine:
The 2006 Chevrolet HHR service manual may feature the HHR parts catalog to give more information about its specifications and functioning.
Toughness and Rigidity:
PT is a step ahead if we talk about the nimbleness of both cars. It will break immediately if your HHR hits a corner too hot. In contrast, PT is flexible enough to survive such a minor blow without much damage.
Whatsoever, both cars offer a bad drive on rough roads. HHR suspension is meant to absorb the jerks rather than crash through them. The freeway expansion joints may also hop out when encountering a bumpy ride.
PT is not as bad on a bumpy road, but it doesn’t offer a smooth ride either. Wind noise and difficulties on bumpy roads are within an acceptable range for both cars.
An Overview:
HHR has two models, I.e., LS and LT. LT comes in two trim levels; 1LT ad 2 LT. LS and 1LT versions of LT models feature the same engine with 2.2 Liters capacity; it produced 150 pound-feet torque and 143 hp energy. Nonetheless, the 2LT trim level 2.4-L engine produced around 172 hp energy. You get it in the five-speed model; however, four-speed is optioned in each model.
One can get rear drum brakes, and front discs augmented with ABS.
PT also has the same five-speed or optional four-speed transmission. 2.4-L turbo four engines that produce 180 horsepower, 2.4-L four engines with 150 hp energy, and 2.4-L high-output turbo-four with its 230 hp energy are the options available for PT. It has MP3-capable radios, optional Boston Acoustics premium audio, and repositioned speakers for enhanced bass response.
Considering the specifications and features of both cars, it seems like both aren’t much different. It is true, but HHR still overweighs PT in many ways!
Frequently Asked Questions
When did they discontinue the HHR?
The last year was the 2011 model
What is the life expectancy of the HHR?
150K-200K miles
What does HHR mean?
Heritage High Roof